Legal Opinion

Mumma v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 1, 1943No. 45338PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitakee, Judge

This is a suit to recover the rental allowance to which plaintiff alleges he is entitled on account of his dependent mother. The proof shows that she was dependent, and that plaintiff was her chief support, and he is therefore entitled to the allowance. The only question presented is whether or not there should be deducted therefrom the value of one room occupied by him in the officers’ barracks.

In Ageton v. United States, 95 C. Cls., 718, the majority of the court held such deduction should be made.

*265Since I was counsel for the defendant in that case by virtue of my former office as Assistant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ageton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Driver v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946
  2. Cole v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
  3. Mogan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
  4. Stott v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945
  5. Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API