Legal Opinion

State v. Hudson

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 27, 2010No. AC 30483PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERS, J.

In this appeal from the defendant’s multicount conviction for credit card theft and identity theft, the state has conceded that it offered no evidence in support of three counts, which charged the defendant with credit card forgery. Accordingly, the defendant’s conviction on those counts of the information must be reversed. The principal issue before us is whether, as the defendant maintains, our remand should order his sentence to be reduced by eliminating his sentence on the specific counts that we reverse or whether, as the state maintains, the case should be remanded for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. PaduaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  3. State v. JamesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. State v. HamptonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  5. State v. MirandaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ElsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  2. State v. McLaughlinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  3. State v. ElsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  4. State v. HudsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  5. State v. ReddickConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API