Legal Opinion

Holmes & Hibbard Mortgage Co. v. Ardmore Nat. Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 22, 1915No. 4741PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from District Court, Carter County; ' S. H. Russell, Judge. The application of the Holmes & Hibbard Mortgage Company, a corporation, for leave to sue E. E. Guillot, appointed receiver for the Smith-Fraley Lumber Company, a corporation, in an action brought against' it by the Ardmore National Bank, a corporation, was denied, and the Mortgage Company brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

WATTS, C.

On May 31, 1912, the Ard-more National Bank filed suit in the district court of Carter county, in its own ' behalf and others similarly situated, against Smith-Fraley Lumber Company, alleging-an indebtedness in its favor in the sum of $1,200 and interest; that it held $10,000 stock and C. R. Smith $20,000 in defendant company and $6,000 was' held by various other parties; that neither plaintiff nor said Smith were directors in said defendant company; that C. E. Fraley was director, vice president, and manager of defendant company, but -owned none of the stock; that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Minot v. MastinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  2. United States Trust Co. v. Chicago Terminal Transfer R.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1911
  3. De Forrest v. CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. First National Bank of Laramie v. CookWyoming Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Meeker v. SpragueWashington Supreme Court · 1892

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hervey v. DyerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
  2. Lively v. Evans-Howard Fire Brick Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Gayer v. RoddieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API