Legal Opinion

United States v. Pedro Nelson Rondon and Nelson Emmanuel Rondon-Trinidad

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 28, 2000No. 1999PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal requires us to consider the effect of an attorney’s disbarment by state authorities during a defendant’s federal trial. Defendants Pedro Nelson Rondon (“Rondon”) and Emmanuel Rondon-Trini-dad (“Rondon-Trinidad”), two brothers, appeal from judgments of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (John E. Sprizzo, Judge), convicting them, following a jury trial, of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute cocaine, and sentencing them principally to 169 months and 151 months of imprisonment, respectively. Although defendants raise…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. United States v. Chaim LevyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Francis Curcio and Gus CurcioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  5. Paul Peter Solina, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. David WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  2. Sanders v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  3. United States v. GriffithsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  4. Pierotti v. HarrisDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
  5. United States v. FarrahDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API