Legal Opinion

Howatt v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided August 19, 1981No. 59-80CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, Chief Judge

The plaintiff in this civilian pay case, a civilian criminal investigator for the Navy, challenges primarily the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his demotion for two charges of misconduct while conducting an investigation. Both parties have moved for summary judgment, and we heard oral argument. On the first charge we conclude that the findings of the Federal Employee Appeals Authority ("Appeals Authority”) were based upon an erroneous legal standard, and we remand the case to the Merit Systems Protection Board (the successor to the Appeals Authority) for further findings under the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. B. Riley McClelland v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  3. Jere L. Denton v. Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  4. Nibali v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  5. Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Robert L. Bradley, Jr. v. Veterans AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  2. Benton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  3. Victor P. Grabis v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  4. Grabis v. Office of Personnel Mgt.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  5. Western Botanicals FL, LLC v. MorseDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API