Legal Opinion

Plaskow v. Peabody International Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 5, 1982No. 81 Civ. 6646 (WCC)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

CONNER, District Judge:

This is a stockholders’ derivative action, Rule 23.1, F.R. Civ. P., brought by Merrill Plaskow, II, a shareholder of Peabody International Corporation (“Peabody”), to recover for the corporation short-swing profits allegedly realized by defendant Merrill Gordon (“Gordon”), a Vice President of Peabody, in violation of Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78p(b). Presently before the Court is the application of the parties for approval of a proposed settlement and an allowance of attorneys’ fees.

The subject of this action is the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dubin v. E.F. Hutton Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  2. Tenney v. BedellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  3. Doe ex rel. Doe v. PeralesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1991
  4. DOE BY DOE v. PeralesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API