Legal Opinion
Doe ex rel. Doe v. Perales
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided March 1, 1991No. Civ. No. 91-6072PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, District Judge.
FACTS
Plaintiffs, all residents of local nursing homes, as representatives of a class, have *202commenced this action to enjoin the defendants from implementing changes in the New York State Medicaid program that have the effect of reducing the amount of exempt resources available to certain Medicaid recipients. Pending before me is plaintiffs’ application for an order restraining defendants from taking any immediate steps to implement the changes pending the court’s decision on plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction.
Unlike most applications for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Rush PETTWAY Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMERICAN CAST IRON PIPE COMPANY, a Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Clarkson Co. v. ShaheenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Morabito v. BlumDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- DOE BY DOE v. PeralesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1991