Toran v. Provident Life & Acc. Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.
The issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in holding that appellant Clarence Toran is precluded by the doctrine of res judicata from litigating certain issues and claims made below against the appellee, Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company (Provident). We find that the trial court’s decision was wrong. Accordingly, we reverse its judgment and remand the case for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
On July 1,1974, Provident issued and delivered a long-term disability policy insuring Toran and other employees of Federal Compress &…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bailey v. Harris Brake Fire Protection DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Smith v. RaoneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Seaboard Finance Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
- Fish v. McLeod, Commissioner of RevenuesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Provident Life & Accident Insurance v. ToranSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
3Cited by11 opinions
- Crockett & Brown, P.A. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Cater v. CaterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Mason v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Daley v. City of Little RockCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
- Robinson v. BuieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.