Legal Opinion

Scott v. Shook

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 12, 1926No. 11,322PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

Defendants in error, plaintiffs below, a copartnership doing business under the name of Shook and Henderson, sued and recovered judgment against Scott, George and Meyer, for alleged conversion of money. The defendants bring the case here for review.

In October, 1921, and prior thereto, the Seott-George Grain Company, a Colorado corporation, was carrying on a general grain brokerage business in Denver. It will be referred to as the broker, or defendants’ company. Its sole officers, directors and stockholders were Scott, George and Meyer, the above defendants, now plaintiffs in error. The broker…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Board of Trade of Chicago v. Christie Grain & Stock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Bibb v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Markham v. . JaudonNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  4. Wilhite v. HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  5. Thomson v. ThomsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Preston-Thomas Construction, Inc. v. Central Leasing Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974
  2. Snowden v. TaggartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  3. Barber v. MeyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API