Upp v. Neuhring
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Sac District Gourt.— HoN'. Z. A. Chuech, Judge. ActioN of replevin. There was a trial to tbe court, and a judgment for tbe defendants. Tbe plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtSiibbwin, C. J.
On tbe lOtli day of March, 1903, the defendants herein, Ringgenberg and Glassnapp, commenced a suit, aided by an attachment against the plaintiff, before a justice of the peace of Sac county, and an attachment was issued and levied on personal property belonging to the plaintiff which was then temporarily in Sac county. There was a judgment against the plaintiff herein in that action, and the property so levied on was at the time this suit was commenced in the possession of the defendant Neuhring, who was the constable who made the levy. The present' suit was commenced in the district court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Graw v. Manning & EppersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
- Bundy v. McKeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
- Mingus v. McLeodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Parsons v. ThomasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- Glover v. NareySupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
3Cited by4 opinions
- Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. LawsonDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1916
- Zacharia v. M. C. Cohen Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Vandeventer v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. PierceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908