Mingus v. McLeod
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Wapello District Court. Defendant appeals from an order overruling his motion to “ dissolve an attachment.”
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
Attachment: ofBcaase?ncy The objection goes to the sufficiency of the cause for the writ, contained in plaintiff’s petition, which is “ that said defendant is in some manner about to dispose of his property without leaving sufficient remaining for the payment of his debts.” And we are to determine whether this is sufficient under *453the third clause of section 3174 of the Revision, which requires the affiant to state “that he (defendant) is in some manner about to dispose of or remove his property out of the State, without leaving sufficient remaining for the payment of his debts.” For the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Danforth, Davis & Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1855
- Sherrill v. FaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
- Branch of the State Bank of Iowa v. WhiteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861
- Lockard & Co. v. EatonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1852
- Wiltse v. StearnsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
3Cited by3 opinions
- Upp v. NeuhringSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Bundy v. McKeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
- Warder, Mitchell & Co. v. ThrilkeldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879