Legal Opinion

Nemeth v. Harriman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 7, 1991No. 90-03341PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHAN, Judge.

We reverse the dismissal with prejudice of this wrongful death suit for medical malpractice. We disagree with the trial court's conclusion that the statute of repose, section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1989), precludes the suit. We conclude that the court erred in ruling that the repose period had expired before there was notice of injury. No contention has been raised concerning the statute of limitations.

The complaint includes the following allegations. In 1980 a pigmented lesion, apparently a mole, was removed from the back of Christopher Nemeth, plaintiff’s husband.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. University of Miami v. BogorffSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  3. Diamond v. ER Squibb and Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1981
  4. Carr v. Broward CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rogers v. RuizDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Goodlet v. StecklerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Harriman v. NemethSupreme Court of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API