In Matter of Marriage of Baumgartner and Baumgartner
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
In this dissolution proceeding, wife assigns as error the trial court’s division of property, its requirement that she be medically examined each year to determine her employ-ability and the failure to grant her permanent spousal support. On de novo review, we modify the property division, eliminate the medical examination requirement and affirm the award of spousal support.
At the time of trial, husband, age 35, and wife, age 41, had been married eight years. Wife is a college graduate and worked as an executive secretary before the marriage, but has not worked since. She suffers from a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. WolfeOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Burke v. BurkeOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Grayson v. GraysonOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Matter of Marriage of CoatsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Grimm v. AshmanskasOregon Supreme Court · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Champion v. ChampionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- Maloney v. Therm Alum Indus. Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Matter of Marriage of ColtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- In re the Marriage of JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016