People v. Camp
California Court of Appeal
1Dissent
O’ROURKE, J.,
Dissenting.- — I respectfully dissent. Reading the Criminal Justice Realignment Act of 2011 (the Realignment Act) in a plain, commonsense manner (see People v. Scott (2014) 58 Cal.4th 1415, 1421 [171 Cal.Rptr.3d 638, 324 P.3d 827]), the trial court erred by terminating Hugo Joseph Camp’s period of mandatory supervision and releasing him from serving the remainder of his suspended sentence. In reaching the contrary conclusion, the majority engages in an overly broad construction of the language of Penal Code1 sections 1170, former subdivision (h)(5)(B)(i) (“The period of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. SeguraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Doe v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. MoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.