Legal Opinion

United States v. Lough

District Court, N.D. West Virginia

Decided November 18, 2016No. CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 1:16CR18PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE [DKT. NO. 43]

IRENE M. KEELEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pending before the Court is the motion to suppress filed by the defendant, Michael P. Lough (“Lough”), seeking to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a warrant issued by United States Magistrate Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan of the Eastern District of Virginia. For the reasons that follow, the Court DENIES the motion (dkt. no. 43).

I. BACKGROUND

In December of 2014, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) became aware that a website operating on the “dark…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. TaylorDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2017
  3. United States v. AustinDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2017
  4. United States v. SullivanDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2017
  5. United States v. JonesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API