Legal Opinion

United States v. Austin

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided February 2, 2017No. 3:16-cr-00068PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR., United States District Judge

I. Introduction

Pending before the Court are the Defendant’s Motion To Suppress Evidence And Statements (Doc. Nos. 19, 42) and the Government’s Response (Doc. Nos. 27, 41) in opposition. The Court held a hearing on the Motion on January 19, 2017. For the reasons set forth herein, the Motion is DENIED.

II. Factual and Procedural Background

Through the pending Motion, the Defendant seeks to suppress all evidence and statements obtained in connection with a residential search warrant executed at his home on September 11, 2015…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Herring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. United States v. MasterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. Donald Ray ScottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. KruegerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  2. State of Tennessee v. Charlotte Lynn Frazier And Andrea ParksTennessee Supreme Court · 2018
  3. United States v. Andrew MooreheadCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. James Ganzer, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. TaylorDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API