Legal Opinion

HATTABAUGH v. TMS INTERNATIONAL, LLC

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 4, 2022No. 2:20-cv-00801Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PHILIP HATTABAUGH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) 2:20-CV-00801-CCW ) v. ) ) TMS INTERNATIONAL, LLC., ) ) ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) OPINION Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 71, filed by Defendant TMS International, LLC (“TMS”). For the following reasons, the Motion will be DENIED. I. Background A. Procedural History Plaintiff Philip Hattabaugh commenced this case as a putative class and collective action,1 ECF No. 1, alleging that TMS failed to pay all overtime wages owed to himself and similarly situated…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API