Legal Opinion

Thornton v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 13, 1986No. 42915PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Weltner, Justice.

Nathaniel Thornton was indicted for the murder of Mary Frances Moss. The state obtained involuntarily from Thornton certain dental impressions, so that his teeth might be compared to marks appearing in an autopsy photograph of the victim. State v. Thornton, 253 Ga. 524 (322 SE2d 711) (1984).

Thornton filed a pre-trial motion for funds to hire a forensic dental expert of his choosing, alleging that he is indigent. The trial court denied Thornton’s motion and we granted his application for interlocutory appeal.

By affidavit, Thornton’s counsel asserts that it is his opinion that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  2. Sabel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  3. Williams v. NewsomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Husske v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
  2. Roseboro v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  3. Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  4. Dubose v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  5. Ely v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API