Legal Opinion
Lane v. Pellissier
California Supreme Court
Decided December 17, 1929No. Docket No. L.A. 11556PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
All appeals in this action not heretofore dismissed upon stipulation are now hereby dismissed. Enumeration of a long list of names is unnecessary.
The basis of this conclusion is that the notices of appeal were not filed within the statutory limit set by section 939 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The judgment was entered September 6, 1928. The notices were filed on and subsequent to February 6, 1929. The time for filing notices of appeal expired November 5, 1928. Proceedings on motion for a new trial were not initiated prior to the last-mentioned date. Manifestly, without some additional…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lancel v. PostlethwaiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Williams v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Wood, Curtis Co. v. Missouri Etc. Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- In re Estate of ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Schurtz v. RomerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Estate of Hanley v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Isbell v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Wilson v. Los Angeles County Employees Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Willard v. Willard (In Re Willard)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.