Legal Opinion

STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. DONALD CURTIS BILLINGS

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 28, 2016No. SD34082Published

1Opinion of the Court

STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) ) vs. ) No. SD34082 ) DONALD CURTIS BILLINGS, ) Filed: November 28, 2016 ) Defendant-Appellant. ) APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TANEY COUNTY Honorable Laura J. Johnson AFFIRMED Donald Curtis Billings ("Defendant") appeals from his conviction for one count of driving while intoxicated. He claims (1) the trial court plainly erred in allowing the State to both adduce evidence and to argue about evidence that Defendant refused to answer questions after having been advised of his Miranda1 rights and (2) the trial court plainly erred in allowing the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Spradling v. DeimekeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  4. State v. RoperMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. State v. CampbellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API