Legal Opinion
Hatley v. City of Union Gap
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 22, 2001No. 19481-7-IIIPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
24 P.3d 444 (2001)
106 Wash.App. 302
Luke HATLEY, Appellant,
v.
CITY OF UNION GAP, a Washington municipal corporation, Respondent.
No. 19481-7-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Three.
May 22, 2001.
Roland L. Skala, Weeks & Skala, Yakima, for Appellant.
Don W. Schussler, Halverson & Applegate, G. Scott Beyer, Menke, Jackson & Beyer, Yakima, for Respondent.
SWEENEY, J.
Luke Hatley connected his Union Gap property to the city water system and paid a connection charge in 1995. The property was unoccupied, so Mr. Hatley kept the water turned off. In 1998, the City of Union Gap added an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Caritas Services, Inc. v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- World Wide Video, Inc. v. City of TukwilaWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Ski Acres, Inc. v. Kittitas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Hiatt v. Walker Chevrolet Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Eugster v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Eugster v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Magula v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Mann v. Household Finance Corp. IIICourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Magula v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.