Legal Opinion

Husted v. Canton Area School District

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 1983No. Appeal, No. 3114 C.S. 1981PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

The factual and procedural background of this appeal may be stated as follows. In April, 1973 the parties entered into a written contract by which appellant Katherine Hnsted became a temporary professional employee of the appellee Canton Area School District. The stated term of the contract is two years. Twenty-two months later, following the receipt by Ms. Husted of an unsatisfactory rating of her performance as a classroom teacher, the appellant was notified that the Board had voted to terminate her employment. The appellant then requested and was granted a hearing on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bearoff v. Bearoff Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. School District of Philadelphia v. TwerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Duquesne Light Co. v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Andresky v. West Allegheny School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. DiCello v. Board of DirectorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roth v. Borough of VeronaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Feigh v. Glendale School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Phillis v. Board of School Directors of Mechanicsburg Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Moore v. Walker, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API