Holladay v. Rich
Nebraska Supreme Court
Rehearing of case reported in 92 Neb. 91.
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHamer, J.
I concur in the conclusion that the court should adhere to the judgment heretofore rendered.
1. While the cogent argument contained in the majority opinion is strong, it appears to me that it might be still stronger and absolutely conclusive if it contained all of the material facts in the case, some of which, no doubt, are left out by inadvertence.
2. I am not satisfied that William J. Holladay, the plaintiff’s husband, was disqualified to testify as a witness under section 329 of the code. I therefore dissent from so much of the opinion as holds that he was disqualified. Under the present…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jahnke v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Orchardson v. CofieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- McCoy v. ConradNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
- Parrish v. McNealNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- Paisley v. PaisleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.