Legal Opinion

Mews v. Beaster

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 16, 2005No. 04-1147PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

¶ 1. The issue in this case arises from pretrial settlement offers made by the defendants to each of three plaintiffs. Wisconsin Stat. § 807.01(1) (2003-04) 1 allows a defendant to serve a written offer of judgment on a plaintiff, which offer the plaintiff must accept within ten days. If the plaintiff does not accept the offer and fails to recover a more favorable judgment, the defendant shall recover costs. Id. However, the offer is not valid unless the offeree is able to fully and fairly evaluate the offer from his or her own perspective. Wilber v. Fuchs, 158 Wis. 2d 158, 164-65, 461 N.W.2d…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. DeWitt Ross & Stevens, S.C. v. Galaxy Gaming & Racing Ltd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. MacKie v. ChizmarAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Stan's Lumber, Inc. v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  4. Testa v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  5. Wilber v. FuchsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Confold Pacific, Inc. v. Polaris Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  2. Capital Times Co. v. DoyleCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011
  3. Confold Pacific Inc v. Polaris Indus IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API