Legal Opinion
Wilber v. Fuchs
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided September 12, 1990No. 89-2395PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, P.J.
The issue on this appeal is whether a plaintiffs offer of settlement of all claims directed individually to multiple defendants is a valid offer of settlement pursuant to sec. 807.01(3), Stats. The trial court ruled that such an offer of settlement is not valid. We agree and affirm the judgment which denied Annacille Wilber double costs pursuant to sec. 807.01(3) and interest from the date of her offer of settlement pursuant to sec. 807.01(4).
Wilber was injured when an automobile she was operating was struck by a truck operated by Paul Brun-nette. Wilber sued Brunnette and also named Carol…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pierringer v. HogerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- DeMars v. LaPourWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- White Ex Rel. Donovan v. General Casualty Co. of WisconsinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- Eby v. KozarekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- Denil v. Integrity Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
3Cited by16 opinions
- Blakeslee Arpaia Chapman, Inc. v. EI Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- D'Huyvetter v. A.O. Smith Harvestore ProductsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- Ritt v. Dental Care Associates, S.C.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
- Blank v. USAA Property & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
- Testa v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.