Legal Opinion

Central Kansas Medical Center v. Hatesohl

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided September 7, 2018No. 113675Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS Nos. 113,675 113,834 CENTRAL KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER, d/b/a St. Rose Ambulatory and Surgery Center, Appellant, v. STANLEY M. HATESOHL, M.D.; GREAT BEND REGIONAL HOSPITAL, L.L.C.; and CENTRAL KANSAS FAMILY PRACTICE, P.C., Appellees. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. The corporate practice of medicine doctrine forbids a corporation from hiring a physician to practice medicine that the corporation itself is not licensed to provide. Contracts in violation of this doctrine are illegal and unenforceable. 2. The Legislature created an exception to the corporate…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ashish Patel, Anverali Satani, Nazira Momin, Minaz Chamadia, and Vijay Lakshmi Yogi v. Texas Department of Licensing and RegulationTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2018
  3. Northern Natural Gas Co. v. ONEOK Field Services Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  4. District Intown Properties Ltd. Partnership v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
  5. Berlin v. Sarah Bush Lincoln Health CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1997

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API