Meyer v. Big Sky Resort
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION CV 18-2-BU-BMM JOHN MEYER, Plaintiff, vs. ORDER BIG SKY RESORT, Defendant. INTRODUCTION Defendant Big Sky Resort (Big Sky) has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 100.) Plaintiff John Meyer (Meyer) opposes the motion. (Doc. 105.) The Court determines that the motion requires no hearing and for the reasons stated denies Big Sky’s motion. DISCUSSION A court should grant summary judgment where the movant demonstrates that no genuine dispute exists “as to any material fact” and the movant is “entitled to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Kay v. EhrlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Solis v. Kirkwood Resort Co.California Court of Appeal · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.