Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Esselburne v. Ohio Department of Agriculture

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 7, 1985No. 84AP-791Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLynch, J.

I concur with the conclusion of the majority opinion that the decision of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas be reversed and that the case be remanded to that court for the purpose of remanding the case to the State Personnel Board of Review for further proceedings resulting in a determination of the controlling factual issues involved in this case.

I agree with most of the reasoning in the majority opinion which, in my opinion, is a comprehensive discussion of the pertinent law applicable to this case. However, I specifically dissent from its holding that in every case that a person…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ryan v. KerrOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State v. Kerr, Dir. of Law.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. State Ex Rel. Townsend v. BerningOhio Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API