Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Berryman

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided July 15, 1859PublishedCited by 7 opinions

CASE 48 — MOTION TO QUASH SUTEKSEDEAS IN COUHT 01? APPEALS.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Simpson

jjelivered the opinion op the court:

This is a motion to quash the supersedas which was issued in this case by the clerk of this court, on the ground that it was issued before a copy of the record had been filed in his office.

By section 889 of the Civil Code, it is provided, “ that a supersedeas shall not be issued by the clerk of the court of appeals until an authenticated copy of the record, with a certified copy of the supersedeas bond, if it was executed before the clerk of the inferior court, shall be filed in his office.”

The prohibition is imperative. A rule is prescribed and no…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Herminghaus v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Vansickle v. HainesNevada Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Shamleffer v. Council Grove Peerless Mill Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1877

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API