Hunt v. Berryman
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 48 — MOTION TO QUASH SUTEKSEDEAS IN COUHT 01? APPEALS.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Simpson
jjelivered the opinion op the court:
This is a motion to quash the supersedas which was issued in this case by the clerk of this court, on the ground that it was issued before a copy of the record had been filed in his office.
By section 889 of the Civil Code, it is provided, “ that a supersedeas shall not be issued by the clerk of the court of appeals until an authenticated copy of the record, with a certified copy of the supersedeas bond, if it was executed before the clerk of the inferior court, shall be filed in his office.”
The prohibition is imperative. A rule is prescribed and no…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Herminghaus v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Vansickle v. HainesNevada Supreme Court · 1872
- Shamleffer v. Council Grove Peerless Mill Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1877
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.