Legal Opinion

Oliver v. Pettaconsett Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 9, 1914PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Negligence.

1Opinion of the CourtParkhurst, J.

This is an action of the case for negligence and after verdict for the plaintiff in the Superior Court, and after denial of defendant’s motion for a new trial, has been duly prosecuted to this court upon the defendant’s bill of exceptions.

The declaration is in two counts. The first count alleges that on the 17th day of December, 1909, the defendant was engaged in the business of constructing a sewer in Ophelia Street, a public highway in the city of Providence; that on said day said Ophelia Street was excavated to a great depth, and was further obstructed by the tools, timber, utensils,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Roddy v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  3. In Re the Probate of the Will of SnellingNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Barber's Appeal From ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  5. Mansfield v. . Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1900

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Washington Trust CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
  2. Stafford v. ThorntonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. Pastorelli v. Associated Engineers, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1959
  4. Forcier v. CardelloDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1994
  5. Tavernier v. McBurneySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API