Haverbekken v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Judge.
Appellants were jointly tried and convicted of affray and each fined $1.
In appealing they made a joint recognizance. This, it appears, is not permissible under the decisions of this court. Goldman v. State, 35 Texas Crim. Rep., 436; Hogg v. State, 40 Texas Crim. Rep., 109; McMeans v. State, 37 Texas Crim. Rep., 130; Hodges v. State, 38 S. W. Rep., 1019; Bowers v. State, 33 S. W. Rep., 974; Irvin v. State, 32 S. W. Rep., 899. Under article 923 appellants would have the right, if they desired to, to amend their recognizance, in which event we will order reinstatement of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Campbell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Morton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
- W. Goldman & Co. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Cryer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- McMeans v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jackson and Shine v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929