Legal Opinion

Jackson and Shine v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 30, 1929No. 12678Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is tampering with 'an automobile ; the punishment confinement in jail for sixty days.

Appellants entered into a joint recognizance. A joint recognizance on appeal will not confer jurisdiction on this court. Our decisions are to the effect that each appellant must give a separate recognizance. Branch’s Annotated Penal Code of Texas, sec. 614. Irvin v. State, 32 S. W. 899; Bowers v. State, 33 S. W. 974; Goldman v. State, 34 S. W. 122; McMeans v. State, 38 S. W. 998; Hodges v. State, 38 S. W. 1019; Hogg v. State, 48 S. W. 580; Haverbekken et al. v. State, 200 S. W.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Campbell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  2. Morton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  3. W. Goldman & Co. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  4. McMeans v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  5. Hogg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API