Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Mohon

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 12, 1960No. 38369PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Vice Chief Justice.

The parties are referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

Plaintiff is a full-blood Creek and Euchee Indian. Defendant was a full-blood Osage Indian. After the filing in this court of petition in error of plaintiff, defendant died. The cause has been revived as to defendant in the name of special administra-trix of his estate, Johnnie Mohon.

Plaintiff filed this action on October 8, 1956, for separate maintenance, alleging that plaintiff and defendant entered into a common-law marriage in March, 1948, and that they lived together as husband and wife until…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sharon v. Sharon, 11991 (Cal. 7-17-1889)California Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Yardley's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1874
  3. In Re Miller's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. In Re Love's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Kilburn v. KilburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mueggenborg v. WallingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. McKee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969
  3. LaDoux v. BohnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  4. Hesington v. Estate of HesingtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Matter of Estate of BouseCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API