Legal Opinion

Cantu v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 28, 1993No. A14-92-01099-CR, A14-92-01107-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

J. CURTISS BROWN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from two theft convictions. Appellant plead guilty to the theft of a pair of shoes in cause number 609,578 and to the theft of a camera and ten containers of nasal spray in cause number 621,946. In both instances the value of the stolen merchandise was under $750. As a result of two prior theft convictions, appellant was convicted of third degree felony theft pursuant to the third offender provision of the Texas Penal Code. See TexPenal Code Ann. § 31.03(e)(4)(E) (Vernon Supp.1993). Appellant’s conviction was enhanced under section…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Foster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Smallwood v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hicks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  2. Carl Stevenson Keesee v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API