John O. Melby & Co. Bank v. Anderson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
The only question presented on this appeal is whether the garnishment restrictions of Title III of the federal Consumer Credit Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. secs. 1671-1677, apply to wages deposited in a checking account. We conclude that the federal statutory restrictions on garnishment do not apply to wages after payment to an employee and deposit in a bank account. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment and order of the county court.
The record shows that the John 0. Melby & Co. Bank was a judgment creditor of the defendant Marilyn Anderson in the amount of $20,000. Because Marilyn An derson and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kokoszka v. BelfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lawrence v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Dunlop v. First National Bank of ArizonaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1975
- Miller v. MonreanAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lawrence v. Jahn (In Re Lawrence)District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1998
- MidAmerica Savings Bank v. MieheSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
- Morrison v. Kobernusz (In Re Kobernusz)District Court, D. Colorado · 1993
- Coward v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
- Frazer, Ryan, Goldberg, Keyt & Lawless v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.