Legal Opinion
Dunlop v. First National Bank of Arizona
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided September 8, 1975No. Civ. 72-118 Phx. WPCPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
COPPLE, District Judge.
The First National Bank of Arizona (hereinafter the Bank) has been served with writs of garnishment 1 which attach funds held for the depositors named in the writs. The Department of Labor (hereinafter the Department) asserts that portions of such deposits may be subject to the provisions of 15 U.S.C. § 1671 et seq. 2 [Consumer Credit Protection Act, Subchapter II]. The Department further maintains that the Bank has an affirmative duty to identify such funds as are exempted under the act and to assert that defense on behalf of its depositors in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Federal Trade Commission v. Simplicity Pattern Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Federal Trade Commission v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Matter of Adoption of VossWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
- Benson v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- Lawrence v. Jahn (In Re Lawrence)District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1998
- U.S. Parking Systems v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Voss v. RalstonWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.