Southern Optical Service, Inc. v. Chominski
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Frankum, Judge.
A creditor brought an action on an open account against a debtor. The latter had allegedly sold and transferred property in violation of the Bulk Sales Act. The *331plaintiff instituted a garnishment proceeding against the purchaser. The present questions concern a garnishment proceeding between the plaintiff and the garnishee. The garnishee filed an answer in the garnishment proceeding denying any indebtedness in any' amount whatsoever. The plaintiff filed a traverse to the answer and issue was joined. The debtor, who sold the property, consented to- a judgment being entered in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Parham & Co. v. Potts-Thompson Liquor Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Long Cigar & Grocery Co. v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Roberts v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Moultrie Grocery Co. v. Holmes-Hartsfield Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Rouse v. Chance & HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.