Legal Opinion

Rouse v. Chance & Hopkins

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 30, 1921No. 12422PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Complaint; from city court of Waynesboro — -Judge W. H. Davis. April 13, 1921.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

This was a suit upon an open account for repairing an automobile. Upon the trial the defendant testified, that he did not owe the plaintiffs anything on the account, as he told the plaintiffs when he left the car with them to be repaired that he did not own it, and that at that time he made an agreement with the plaintiffs for them to repair the car, sell it, retain the cost of repairing, and turn over the balance of the money, if any, to him (the defendant). This was denied by the plaintiffs, and the jury returned the following verdict: “ We, the jury, find for the plaintiff — so say we…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seifert v. HoltSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  2. Mize v. MashburnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Swain v. Georgia Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  2. Blackman v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  3. Mock v. WrigleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  4. Southern Optical Service, Inc. v. ChominskiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API