Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Ruttenau

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 5, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Hetherington, S.

The decedent died on March 9,1928, leaving a last will and testament which was admitted to probate on March 23, 1928. After providing for the payment of his debts and funeral expenses and certain legacies, the testator gave his entire residuary estate to the Bankers Trust Company, in trust, to collect and apply the income to the use of his daughter until she attained the age of thirty-five years, at which time it was directed to pay her the capital of the trust. In the event of his daughter predeceasing him or dying prior to the prescribed age leaving issue, the same was to go…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hollis v. . Drew Theological SeminaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. In Re the Accounting of Brooklyn Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. In re the Legacy Given by the Will of MillsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1923
  4. In re Brooklyn Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  5. In re Bank of AmericaNew York Surrogate's Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of KraetzerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API