Legal Opinion

DiSANTOS. v. Adase

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 27, 1971PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

116 N.J. Super. 226 (1971)

281 A.2d 810

PHYLLIS DiSANTO, ET ALS., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

MILDRED M.A. ADASE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 21, 1971.

Decided September 27, 1971.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, COLLESTER and MINTZ.

Mr. Sam J. Abraham argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Magner, Abraham, Orlando & Kahn, attorneys).

Mr. Joseph J. Triarsi argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Pisano & Triarsi, attorneys).

2Per curiam

The single issue projected by plaintiffs' appeal is whether a subsequent remarriage of a divorced couple reinstates their…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Danes v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  2. Mueller v. MuellerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  3. Gery v. GerySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  4. Buttlar v. ButtlarNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1904
  5. Eberle v. SomonekNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. N.T.B. v. D.D.B.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
  2. Loughlin v. LoughlinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  3. Asker v. AskerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  4. Olen v. OlenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  5. Wooldridge v. WooldridgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API