Legal Opinion

Orsen v. General Accident & Life Assurance Corp.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Beaver County

Decided October 21, 1985No. 226 of 1984Published

1Opinion of the Court

KUNSELMAÑ, J.,

The parties’ cross motions for summary judgment raise the question of whether a victim who is otherwise entitled'to receive work loss benefits under the No-fault Act (now repealed) is precluded from recovering-such benefit because she subsequently, applied for and received unemployment compensation benefits. We hold that she is not so precluded and therefore grant her motion for summary judgment.

The parties- have agreed upon the facts and so summary judgment may be entered if appropriate to do so. Pa. R.C.P. 1035(b), Dowlin v. Coatsville School District, 22 Pa. Commw. 433, 350…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sturdevant Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Allstate Insurance v. HeffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Kamperis v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Hartleb v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Dowlin v. Coatesville Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API