Legal Opinion
Provena Hospitals v. Sebelius
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 13, 2009No. Civil Action WMN-08-1054PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WILLIAM M. NICKERSON, Senior District Judge.
This action arises out of the November 30, 1997, consolidation of three Illinois hospital systems. Plaintiff Provena Hospitals (Provena), the entity into which the three systems consolidated, brings this action as the successor-in-interest to Mercy Center for Health Care Services (Mercy Center), one of the consolidating entities. Provena challenges the decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the Secretary) denying Mercy Center’s reimbursement claims for approximately $4.5 million in depreciation-related losses that Provena…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. LeavittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Montanans for Multiple Use v. BarbouletosCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Albert Einstein Medical Center v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Forsyth Memorial Hospital Inc. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Pinnacle Health Hospitals v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Tugaw Ranches, LLC v. U.S. Dep't of the InteriorDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2019
- Forsyth Memorial Hospital Inc v. LeavittDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Pinnacle Health Hospitals v. JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010