Legal Opinion

Albert Einstein Medical Center v. Sebelius

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 22, 2009No. 07-3807PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.

Germantown Hospital and Medical Center (“Old Germantown”) submitted to the representative of the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS” or “Administrator”), a reimbursement claim for loss on depreciable assets resulting from its 1997 statutory merger into Germantown Hospital and Community Health Services (“New Germantown”). The Administrator denied the claim because he found that the Old Germantown merger was between “related parties” and did not constitute a “bona fide sale.” Albert Einstein…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. LeavittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  4. Mercy Home Health v. Michael O. Leavitt, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  5. Sbc Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. St. Luke's Hospital v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
  2. St. Luke's Hospital v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  3. United States v. StevensDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
  4. Eaves-Voyles v. Almost Family, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. District Hospital Partners, L.P. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API