Legal Opinion

Pungs v. American Brake-Beam Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1900PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Wayne; Waite, J. Assumpsit by William A. Pungs against the American Brake-Beam Company for wages. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

Plaintiff brought suit to recover salary for the months of August, September, October, November, and December, 1897, claimed to be due under a.written contract of employment by the defendant for the year 1897. By the terms of the contract, plaintiff was employed to superintend the manufacture of brake beams; his compensation being $5,000, payable in monthly installments of $416.66. Among other things, he agreed “to cause the work to be doné efficiently, promptly, and to the satisfaction of the Brake-Beam Company, and at the least possible cost to it;” and, further, “to provide the necessary…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bolt v. FriederickMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pungs v. American Brake-Beam Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API