People v. Renaud
New York County Courts
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Peter L. Broderick, J.
The defendant has made a motion requesting this court to review the sufficiency of the grand jury minutes pursuant to sections 210.20 and 210.30 of the Criminal Procedure Law.
The question before this court is whether the facts before the grand jury are sufficient to establish the offenses charged or any lesser-included offenses. The test is whether the evidence, unexplained and uncontradicted, would warrant a conviction by a trial jury.
Upon a review of the grand jury minutes, the evidence presented is sufficient to support count two of the indictment…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- People v. JenningsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. PelchatNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. ManiniNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. SinistajNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. DanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. GabbidonNew York County Court, Dutchess County · 2005