Legal Opinion

People v. Renaud

New York County Courts

Decided September 17, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Peter L. Broderick, J.

The defendant has made a motion requesting this court to review the sufficiency of the grand jury minutes pursuant to sections 210.20 and 210.30 of the Criminal Procedure Law.

The question before this court is whether the facts before the grand jury are sufficient to establish the offenses charged or any lesser-included offenses. The test is whether the evidence, unexplained and uncontradicted, would warrant a conviction by a trial jury.

Upon a review of the grand jury minutes, the evidence presented is sufficient to support count two of the indictment…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. People v. JenningsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. People v. PelchatNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. ManiniNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. People v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. People v. SinistajNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. DanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. People v. GabbidonNew York County Court, Dutchess County · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API