Legal Opinion
State v. Davis
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided May 18, 1977No. 7626SC1009PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
In his charge to the jury, Judge Falls instructed as to assault with a deadly weapon inflicting serious injury as follows:
“And the third essential element, that the defendant inflicted serious bodily injury. Now, I have told you what the injury is, and you have heard what injuries he has received, and I shall not repeat that. That doesn’t mean it isn’t important. It is an essential element. A fractured skull is a serious injury.” (Emphasis added.)
Both defendants contend that the trial judge, by instructing that the victim’s skull fracture was a serious injury, violated G.S.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. Marshall Norman HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. SpringsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. HedgepethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. PettifordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. GrierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. PughCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.