Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 18, 1977No. 7626SC1009PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

In his charge to the jury, Judge Falls instructed as to assault with a deadly weapon inflicting serious injury as follows:

“And the third essential element, that the defendant inflicted serious bodily injury. Now, I have told you what the injury is, and you have heard what injuries he has received, and I shall not repeat that. That doesn’t mean it isn’t important. It is an essential element. A fractured skull is a serious injury.” (Emphasis added.)

Both defendants contend that the trial judge, by instructing that the victim’s skull fracture was a serious injury, violated G.S.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. Marshall Norman HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. SpringsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HedgepethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. PettifordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. GrierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. PughCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API