Legal Opinion

Matienza v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided October 16, 1985No. 05-84-00690-CRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANCE, Justice.

Appellant, Julio Matienza, was convicted of unlawful possession of cocaine, a controlled substance, and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. In two grounds of error, appellant argues that the trial court erred by overruling his motion to suppress evidence allegedly tainted by an illegal arrest. We need not determine whether the complained-of detention was a “seizure” within the meaning of United States Constitution Amendments IV, XIV, or, if so, whether the seizure, if any, was legal because we hold that an intervening criminal act purged the taint of any illegality in the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Wicker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Holmes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1998
  2. Reed v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
  3. State v. John Berry Jackson, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2014
  4. Fontenot v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  5. Foster v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API