Legal Opinion
Fontenot v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided June 14, 1990No. 05-89-00284-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS, Justice.
John Fontenot appeals his conviction of unlawful possession with intent to deliver cocaine. Following a trial to the court, Fontenot was sentenced to five years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections, 1 probated for a period of five years. In three points of error, Fontenot contends that: (1) the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress evidence; (2) the evidence is insufficient to show that he possessed cocaine with the intent to deliver; and (3) the evidence is insufficient to show that he possessed cocaine. We disagree and accordingly…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Frierson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
- Dawson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
- Goines v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
- Gallups v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
- Hall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.