Lazarus C. Finney v. Harry J. Rothgerber, Jr., Kentucky Parole Board, George Wilson
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LIVELY, Chief Judge.
Two issues are presented in this habeas corpus appeal. The first is whether the state trial court violated a criminal defendant’s constitutional right to be present at every stage of the proceedings by denying a motion to postpone the conclusion of the trial when the defendant failed to return to the courtroom following a luncheon recess. If the first issue is not dispositive, the second is whether the trial court violated the defendant’s Fifth Amendment right to be free of compulsory self-incrimination by declining to give a requested instruction in the persistent felony…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- White v. WoodallSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- People v. GlasperIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
- United States v. Juan M. Gordon, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Martin R. Bryan v. Warden, Indiana State ReformatoryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- State v. MunnTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.