Legal Opinion

Lazarus C. Finney v. Harry J. Rothgerber, Jr., Kentucky Parole Board, George Wilson

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 8, 1985No. 84-5157PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVELY, Chief Judge.

Two issues are presented in this habeas corpus appeal. The first is whether the state trial court violated a criminal defendant’s constitutional right to be present at every stage of the proceedings by denying a motion to postpone the conclusion of the trial when the defendant failed to return to the courtroom following a luncheon recess. If the first issue is not dispositive, the second is whether the trial court violated the defendant’s Fifth Amendment right to be free of compulsory self-incrimination by declining to give a requested instruction in the persistent felony…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. White v. WoodallSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. People v. GlasperIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  3. United States v. Juan M. Gordon, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  4. Martin R. Bryan v. Warden, Indiana State ReformatoryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  5. State v. MunnTennessee Supreme Court · 2001

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API