Legal Opinion

Kauffman-Harmon v. Kauffman

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 2001No. 00-603PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier

¶1 Elizabeth Kauffman-Harmon and Rebecca Kauffman-Piotrowski (hereinafter “Elizabeth and Rebecca”) appeal from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order issued by the Eleventh Judicial District, Flathead County on June 16, 2000.

¶2 Although the appellants present seven issues on appeal, we find one issue dispositive: Do principles of equity, such as judicial estoppel and the clean hands doctrine, prevent Dr. David V. Kauffman, Sr., and Ruth E. Kauffman from claiming the corporation’s assets and stock are held in resulting and constructive trusts?

¶3 We reverse and remand for further…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hansen v. 75 Ranch Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In Re Raymond W. George TrustMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Rowland v. KliesMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Fiedler v. FiedlerMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Murphy v. RedlandMontana Supreme Court · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Stanley L. and Carolyn M. Watkins Trust v. LacostaMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Stevens v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. West Virginia Department of Transportation, Division of Highways v. RobertsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. United States v. Victor Robert Nava, Sr., AKA Big Vic, and Victoria NavaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Nelson v. NelsonMontana Supreme Court · 2002

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API